Two Minute Papers - 2018-02-25
The paper "A Hyperbolic Geometric Flow for Evolving Films and Foams" is available here: https://sadashigeishida.bitbucket.io/hgf/index.html Recommended for you: 1. Reddit discussion on bubble thickness measurements - https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1wva6u/is_it_possible_to_measure_the_thickness_of_a_soap/ 2. An early episode on bubbles - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj8b5mu0P7Y We would like to thank our generous Patreon supporters who make Two Minute Papers possible: Andrew Melnychuk, Brian Gilman, Christian Ahlin, Christoph Jadanowski, Dennis Abts, Emmanuel, Eric Haddad, Esa Turkulainen, Evan Breznyik, Frank Goertzen, Malek Cellier, Marten Rauschenberg, Michael Albrecht, Michael Jensen, Raul Araújo da Silva, Robin Graham, Shawn Azman, Steef, Steve Messina, Sunil Kim, Torsten Reil. https://www.patreon.com/TwoMinutePapers One-time payment links are available below. Thank you very much for your generous support! PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/TwoMinutePapers Bitcoin: 13hhmJnLEzwXgmgJN7RB6bWVdT7WkrFAHh Ethereum: 0x002BB163DfE89B7aD0712846F1a1E53ba6136b5A LTC: LM8AUh5bGcNgzq6HaV1jeaJrFvmKxxgiXg Music: Antarctica by Audionautix is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Artist: http://audionautix.com/ Thumbnail background image credit: https://pixabay.com/photo-1916692/ Splash screen/thumbnail design: Felícia Fehér - http://felicia.hu Károly Zsolnai-Fehér's links: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TwoMinutePapers/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/karoly_zsolnai Web: https://cg.tuwien.ac.at/~zsolnai/
Thanks for the video. I enjoy these quick explanations. Because even thougj i'm not interested in 3d simulation i still like to expand my knowledge of computer science :)
I wander if this could be used to simulate the surface of an ocean
if all those things that are happening in CGI were implenented into blender's cycles render engine we would stop using anything else. Boy that would be awesome...
Sweet
Great content as always
PS: who dislike this?
Vapor Wave - sama There is always a dislike. That's like the 0'th law of youtube dynamics.
pounds fist into palm we oughtta find these people and pummel them.
These would be like the republicans of the liking/disliking system. They go around liking what's immoral/wrong/harmful and disliking everything that drives progress, innovation and equality. XD
must have been miss clicks
Why cant it be implemented on blender?
Give them time, if the source code exists, someone will probably adapt it as a plugin.
Holy Mother of Papers Batman!
Excellent!
voice narration by the google AI text reader?
Hey Karoly! Your content is great, I always get excited to see a notification from your channel. Have you considered covering papers related to development with cryptocurrency or blockchain technology? e.g. new proof mechanisms, whitepapers for new projects/networks, that sort of thing? I think there would be a great demand for that, as well as a very interesting research topic for yourself and your viewers. Thanks again for the always-amazing videos!
Hey there Jace. Thanks for dropping by! I have played with the thought of this, and I think the following: this is outside of the range of topics I work with daily, so I would need to ask for a second opinion from an expert. This costs money and time, both of which are scarce until Two Minute Papers becomes a full-time endeavor. The other question is even more important: YouTube is full of hundreds of videos on these topics, and I would definitely want to avoid creating a k+1-th video on the very same topic with the same angle - it would need to have a different spin. This is also a bit more time intensive than I can manage currently as I am still working as a full-time researcher. I hope that later, this will be a possibility and would love to create some off-axis episodes every now and then (of course, in moderation).
Please focus on AI. Cryptocurrencies are popular now. Siraj took this topic. Enough....
Dear Marcin, worry not! The focus remains what it currently is. :)
Absolutely, thanks for the reply! Yes I love the focus of this channel, the only reason I ask is because I recently received an explanation of some new technology in that space from the mathematician on that team. He was explaining the abstract algebra involved in their work and subsequently the applications of those studies. It made me think of this channel, because you have a gift for simplifying full explanations for public understanding. Keep doing what you do best!
When you address us as fellow scholars, i feel i should inform you as a few months subscriber, that i do not regard myself as one. In fact i think im doing a good job if i understand near half of ur talks. Keep up the complicated content!
I love your proverb neologisms.
M'lady
Another paper but where are all the commercial apps based on these papers ???
If I would have the skill to make those simulations ... I sure would not have the skill to make those renders .... impressive!
why are these programs never available as executable, only as source files? I would love to look at some bubbles but getting the source code to run is so much work
Because they're meant for researchers, simple as that. Sure, it would be nice to have a well polished pretty UI that anyone can use, but that requires a lot of extra work and maintenance. I'm glad they even published the source code, often I have to recreate
something that has already been done, from scratch, simply because the authors refused to provide that. It wastes time and makes it harder to validate results. Conversely, only providing the compiled program would be just as awful and unscientific.
Give a man a fish ...
Read the paper and reproduce it in vex in Houdini, problem solved
I wonder if large Hadron collider can be simulated using that would save a hell lotta money
Dude, even if a simulation could precisely replicate everything we know about reality it would still not be able to replace an experiment because, by definition, it's not real! The underlying assumption of all physical science is that the fundamental laws of nature don't change, so we fit our theory to reality and not the other way around.
André Mello exactly
Actually lhc , all its structures, elements, detectors and even surrounding rocks are modeled and simulated. And then compared with real data from experiments to detect new and unknown yet phenomena, like new particles.
Hadron collider is already simulation of The Big Bang. You mean that simulation of simulation.
They usually start with a simulation at the LHC, probably thousands of them, before ever powering on the machine. But a simulation can't confirm anything, they need the physical experiment to confirm or disprove what the simulation and theory says. And something something unexpected comes out, so they have to revise the theory and simulation models.
Joe Rivera - 2018-02-25
Beautiful. The only thing missing is the bubbles’ inevitable popping.
Damian Reloaded - 2018-02-25
It's completely avoidable in a simulation tho. ^_^ I figure that part would be the easiest, just pop one vertex from every triangle on a seam, one seam at the time until you went trough the whole bubble. ^_^
Seneral - 2018-02-27
Well as far as I remember bubbles pop because their film gets thinner and thinner due to evaporation, so it would require some stress simulation based on thickness, but yes I would think it would be rather easy using this paper:)